Also I want to address the "disability accessible art" argument. I'd rather see a disabled person experiment different ways to create art despite their circumstances, than sit and let the ai do the work for them. Like if someone with a limb difference created a painting; even if they don't intend on the painting having a meaning behind it, the existence of the painting itself symbolises their human endurance and creativity. Ai cannot replicate that.
a while ago i saw a video about an artist (i don’t remember what condition they had specifically) who didn’t have use of their hands and instead used their mouth to move the brush to make art!
AI could definitely produce an image “in the style of”, but a great deal of what drove his work was the effort and innovation intrinsic to his particular disability.
The aesthetic output of his work was the bi-product of a process that was specific to his body.
I had a preschool child in my class who said he "couldn't paint". I showed him a photograph of a armless kid who used his feet to paint. I said, if he can do it, you can. the kid then joyously painted every day. I'm glad you brought this issue up.
The rise of AI writers/artists is scary considering the fact that writing is one of the most human ways of expressing emotions. Language is culture, words are art in on itself so it’s very insulting to call yourself one when you can’t even appreciate the beauty language as a whole is. AI artists are never fulfilled because that don’t know the feeling of creating something wholly unique on your own and that saddens me
i’ve never really left a comment on here but you’re one of my favourites on here. it’s like you knew i needed these words. i was in a meeting listening to someone talk about a tool to “humanise” the work they did with ai and i was simply dumbfounded. how are you using ai to do the work for you, then using it again to “humanise” the work? what is it that said person even does? is it truly “working smart” if you aren’t even doing anything? what’s smart about any of it? seeing your post made me happy to know there’s still people that aren’t falling for none of it. brilliant piece as always.
this idea that the only things worth worshipping are productivity and ease is so deeply macabre. friction makes us resilient and learned. i'm honoured you've left this comment despite never having done so before; feeling very smug 🤭💗
God, thank you sooo sooo much for this. Thank you thank you thank you.
It’s been a bleak year but the last couple of days have been especially difficult. Your work brings me so much joy. It understands my anger, and I’m grateful. Thanks again.
It's been really off putting lately as a small writer on here who hasn't found much success (not that it's stopping me), to keep coming across viral posts that have been so obviously written by ChatGPT, and yet the people in the comments are eating it up, completely unaware. I think there needs to be more education on how to spot the signs, because I thought it was glaringly obvious, but apparently it fools a lot of people.
I'm always tempted to say something in the comments but I'm afraid of getting piled on. There is also that fear that some people may actually just be writing in the same way that ChatGPT does because that's how they got started, or something (doesn't make it okay).
"making art is hard. there is no cheat code that would make it easy. excavating the soul should be hard; it would be alarming if it wasn’t. the satisfaction you feel, however, when you see the words trooping along the page exactly as you dreamed them up, melodic and honest; it is heaven made real."
The people getting rich off LLM’s and the stolen work of millions of writers have created propaganda about AI with their marketing—that’s it’s an advancement like “the printing press” which is objectively false—we need essays like this to remind everyone of the truth, to make sure the narrative is correct, to make sure young creatives don’t accidentally give away their souls
Funny enough their connection is already being cut. They WILL be priced out of that which they have given away and we ARE better than them for not being left completely inept by the looming paywall. And that piece was ridiculous. A whole opinion piece but I don't even know where you end and the clanker begins.
Something else llm users largely fail to understand is that these platforms are completely unsustainable the way they are now. Hundreds of billions of dollars are being pumped into these companies thru investor capital and low 10s of billions are being generated in profits. They are failing utterly to generate enough profit to even sustain the infrastructure it takes to run their massive data centers year to year. When the bubble pops what's going to have to happen (aside from potentially tanking the us/world economy) is that cost for llm usage is either going to skyrocket or, also likely, chatgpt will be shoving ads into the faces of all its users, much like how all social media platforms do now. And that's if these companies can even survive at all on their own. So I wouldnt be surprised if the ai using essayists polluting the platform start accidentally dropping walmart ads or something in the middle of their posts soon. Great essay btw!
Also I want to address the "disability accessible art" argument. I'd rather see a disabled person experiment different ways to create art despite their circumstances, than sit and let the ai do the work for them. Like if someone with a limb difference created a painting; even if they don't intend on the painting having a meaning behind it, the existence of the painting itself symbolises their human endurance and creativity. Ai cannot replicate that.
❗️❗️❗️
a while ago i saw a video about an artist (i don’t remember what condition they had specifically) who didn’t have use of their hands and instead used their mouth to move the brush to make art!
Amazing🥰
Exhibit: Chuck Close.
AI could definitely produce an image “in the style of”, but a great deal of what drove his work was the effort and innovation intrinsic to his particular disability.
The aesthetic output of his work was the bi-product of a process that was specific to his body.
It can replicate the style, but not the process or the heart that went into it. That's my point. Art isn't just about style.
I had a preschool child in my class who said he "couldn't paint". I showed him a photograph of a armless kid who used his feet to paint. I said, if he can do it, you can. the kid then joyously painted every day. I'm glad you brought this issue up.
That's lovely. I brought it up being disabled myself, not physically but still.
clicked on this SO FAST
just sprouted wings and an ego the size of london. j'adore angel 💕💕
i know ur saying that to me and not griffin and i approve of this favoritism
to be loved is to be known lol he's lovely but ur everything 🙂↕️
I dont get
This is exactly the piece I have been waiting for. Thank you for writing it.
me too lol
great minds, etc etc
Same, saw the notification was from you them immediately clicked.
The rise of AI writers/artists is scary considering the fact that writing is one of the most human ways of expressing emotions. Language is culture, words are art in on itself so it’s very insulting to call yourself one when you can’t even appreciate the beauty language as a whole is. AI artists are never fulfilled because that don’t know the feeling of creating something wholly unique on your own and that saddens me
i’ve never really left a comment on here but you’re one of my favourites on here. it’s like you knew i needed these words. i was in a meeting listening to someone talk about a tool to “humanise” the work they did with ai and i was simply dumbfounded. how are you using ai to do the work for you, then using it again to “humanise” the work? what is it that said person even does? is it truly “working smart” if you aren’t even doing anything? what’s smart about any of it? seeing your post made me happy to know there’s still people that aren’t falling for none of it. brilliant piece as always.
this idea that the only things worth worshipping are productivity and ease is so deeply macabre. friction makes us resilient and learned. i'm honoured you've left this comment despite never having done so before; feeling very smug 🤭💗
God, thank you sooo sooo much for this. Thank you thank you thank you.
It’s been a bleak year but the last couple of days have been especially difficult. Your work brings me so much joy. It understands my anger, and I’m grateful. Thanks again.
this means everything. humbled you took the time to read xx
as someone studying law for AI regulation: this is amazing
thank you for reading but omg thank you SO much more for actively engaging with work that might end up protecting us. doing God's work.
well fuck me, ayan. I wish a bitch would try to plagiarize this.
teehee 🤭 love you darling
This was perfect, thank you for writing it.
It's been really off putting lately as a small writer on here who hasn't found much success (not that it's stopping me), to keep coming across viral posts that have been so obviously written by ChatGPT, and yet the people in the comments are eating it up, completely unaware. I think there needs to be more education on how to spot the signs, because I thought it was glaringly obvious, but apparently it fools a lot of people.
I'm always tempted to say something in the comments but I'm afraid of getting piled on. There is also that fear that some people may actually just be writing in the same way that ChatGPT does because that's how they got started, or something (doesn't make it okay).
Anyway, I enjoyed this and subscribed!
"making art is hard. there is no cheat code that would make it easy. excavating the soul should be hard; it would be alarming if it wasn’t. the satisfaction you feel, however, when you see the words trooping along the page exactly as you dreamed them up, melodic and honest; it is heaven made real."
Fabulously well done.
The people getting rich off LLM’s and the stolen work of millions of writers have created propaganda about AI with their marketing—that’s it’s an advancement like “the printing press” which is objectively false—we need essays like this to remind everyone of the truth, to make sure the narrative is correct, to make sure young creatives don’t accidentally give away their souls
Funny enough their connection is already being cut. They WILL be priced out of that which they have given away and we ARE better than them for not being left completely inept by the looming paywall. And that piece was ridiculous. A whole opinion piece but I don't even know where you end and the clanker begins.
what a masterpiece!!!
Those closing lines 🙌
Something else llm users largely fail to understand is that these platforms are completely unsustainable the way they are now. Hundreds of billions of dollars are being pumped into these companies thru investor capital and low 10s of billions are being generated in profits. They are failing utterly to generate enough profit to even sustain the infrastructure it takes to run their massive data centers year to year. When the bubble pops what's going to have to happen (aside from potentially tanking the us/world economy) is that cost for llm usage is either going to skyrocket or, also likely, chatgpt will be shoving ads into the faces of all its users, much like how all social media platforms do now. And that's if these companies can even survive at all on their own. So I wouldnt be surprised if the ai using essayists polluting the platform start accidentally dropping walmart ads or something in the middle of their posts soon. Great essay btw!
THIS is art. No hyperbole, this essay is pure art
jesus christ this is amazing. it baffles me that some people don’t see the issue in ai generated writing. you can’t imitate having a soul.