i remember watching the fallout of hurricane katrina on tv.
i couldn’t have been older than nine or ten. a tall, white-haired anderson cooper was stood with one hand clutching a microphone, his other wrapped tight around the waist of the woman he’d been interviewing, as if to stop her from collapsing. he had asked her what she was going to do next, how she would go on. i remember watching her face crumple under the weight of her grief. she- like many- had lost everything in the wake of the hurricane: her home, family members, her belongings. her only reply was a broken sob.
i remember being surprised by how cooper treated her. he looked visibly moved by her testimony and gave her the space to talk, uninterrupted. at one point, he himself looked close to tears; after all, american journalism does not have a better performer of empathy than anderson cooper.
his behavior used to sit starkly in contrast with all the other suited journalists who sat behind desks, relaying the most heartbreaking news in the same robotic, monotonous tones. he was warm, funny, stern, and firm when he needed to be. i was a child, naive and idealistic. he seems fair, i used to think. that’s the kind of journalist i want to be.
he went to dangerous places and reported on global issues. this was, of course, before i had the language to diagnose this brand of ‘white savior’ reporting,’ where international (usually western, usually white) journalists gain acclaim for playing progressive knights in shining armor in ‘third world countries.’ now i see that he is one of many rich kids who spent his life fetishizing the suffering of black and brown communities, moved only by a need to be on scene with no moral responsibility to make the communities he interacts with safer or better.
we’ve seen the reports, and recognize this kind of ‘brave in the action journo’ archetype; bare faced, perfectly attractive white journos, skin now tan from the exotic suns they have so graciously trekked under. they’ll film a child who is begging on the streets of Somalia before they’ll ever drop a dollar into his outstretched hand.
it has, therefore, been alarming but not surprising to watch him- and all he represents- melt into a puddle of professional hypocrisy these last few months.
western media has a moral superiority complex rooted in the upholding of what they call ‘news values.’
in journalism school, we were taught that they served as a quiet manifesto and guideline to help shape the process of news production: you cannot platform one side of a political debate without also platforming the other, you may not make assertions morally, the language you use must remain neutral, you must cross-examine all sources and their claims, checking and counter-checking any information that they are given, you cannot act as the stenographer to a state and must reserve all rights to determine your agenda as a news organization, free from the interference of hostile states.
what an endlessly astonishing thing it has been, then, to watch the same media who brag about how diligent their reporting is break every single one of their own rules as they refuse to follow the parameters and ethical codes they’ve set for themselves. the BBC, the New York Times, and others published uncorroborated propaganda claims about Hamas raping women and beheading babies, with the IDF themselves having to come forward and clarify that there was no proof of such claims. sky news had to apologize after insinuating on several occasions that a Palestinian politician was a Hamas sympathizer.
decolonizers and Palestinians who are talking about losing loved ones to israel’s bombardment are presented with the same unoriginal, barely coded question on air: ‘Do you condemn Hamas?’ while the same journalists refuse to ask allies of the israeli government if they condemn the continued violation of international law netanyahu and his cabinet have been found guilty of. CNN and Sky News both admitted that any reporting they’re doing in the region is corroborated and controlled by the IDF, their coverage, and what they can film editorially restricted by the entity they are meant to hold accountable.
reporting that israelis were killed while Palestinians simply died, as if 45,000 people simply committed mass suicide instead of being bombarded, told to flee and then hunted like dogs. as if little children’s bodies aren’t on video, riddled with bullet holes. so eager are my colleagues to remove the weight of responsibility off israel’s shoulders, they’ve started to refer to Palestinian children as ‘young adults’. we have stripped them even of their childhood. it is not systemic government policy that is responsible for these deaths, it seems, but some inexplicable force.
gone is the soft, human touch of anderson cooper, who now tries to ensnare guests into calling Palestinians barbaric, who currently sits exclusively behind a desk in a suit, calling a genocide anything but the words ‘conflict,’ ‘war,’ and ‘unrest’ roll from him and his colleague’s lips with alarming, shameless ease.
where is the truth they claimed to worship?
because when it comes to Palestine, the truth is profoundly uncomplicated.
countless human rights organizations, including Amnesty International, Save the Children, and the World Health Organization, hundreds of genocide experts, including the former head of the United Nations New York office (who resigned over his agency’s handling of Israel’s crimes), historians, and journalists have come forward and condemned israel as a genocidal state. israel has been under investigation by the International Criminal Court since 2014, and this year found that israel had met the heinous standards needed to be classified as a genocide. there is even an arrest warrant out for netanayhu.
if the endless videos of hospitals and mosques and churches and bakeries and libraries and schools being bombed by Israel (actions that are again illegal), if the statements being made by government officials who said, outright, that they were enacting the next stage of ‘ethnic cleansing,’ if the IDF did not brag about bombing Al Shifa hospital on Facebook, if netanyahu had not held up a map of israel that no longer had East Jerusalem, The West Bank or Gaza on it in front of the General Assembly early last year, the lack of definitive position on Palestine in western media would make sense.
but this evidence does exist, and the choice to ignore it is an editorial one that speaks to a concerning inability to hold oppressors accountable if it isn’t profitable- or popular- to do so.
they haven’t just betrayed their professional responsibility, the ideals and standards they promised to uphold as media workers. these news organizations have also betrayed their colleagues internationally.
according to the Committee to Protect Journalists, Israel has killed more than 137 journalists since October 7th. the organization also reported that journalists are being targeted with tear gas and unidentified bullets while reporting from areas they were told were ‘media safe zones.’ covering the Israeli apartheid government has been the deadliest assignment for journalists since records began, and what has the response been by the media here?
silence.
despite it being a dangerous precedent to set for future regimes and a clear violation of the Geneva Convention (which states that ‘journalists engaged in dangerous professional missions in areas of armed conflict shall be considered as civilians’), the papers and publications with the most power in the West have made no unified statement to condemn Israel for their crimes against their profession.
american news organizations crossed even political lines to condemn donald trump when he revoked one of their colleague’s press passes, rebuking it as an attempt to silence a free press. they do not seem in such a hurry to condemn a genocidal state’s continued assault on the media, perhaps because the people being killed are brown journalists.
if they are not dead, these reporters live in fear for their lives, like Al Jazeera’s Anas Al Shareef, whom israeli officers directly threatened to stop his coverage in the region. Plestia Alaqad, a young Palestinian journalist, has fled her home because of the systemic targeting of media workers, with another famous journalist, Motaz, also being forced to flee after being hunted by the state for months.
israel is going out of their way to intimidate the media organizations doing vital reporting on their crimes because to silence those collecting proof is to stifle the global uprising. they’re issuing threats in broad daylight, with Israel’s Communication minister shlomo karhi referring to independent media organization haaretz as publishing ‘lying defeatist propaganda’ that ‘undermines Israel at a time of war.’ we all know what they did to Shireen Abu Akleh and how they disrespected her even in death.
this is simple to understand. every single journalist operating in the west who refuses to use their position in the newsroom to condemn this apparent attack on our profession is arming israel- and other oppressive states- with the knowledge that there are two tiers of journalists: ones who the West cares to defend, and disposable ones. this moment has served as a clearing of the mist for many of us journalists of color.
we see you clearly now. we see that the ideals you preach and the ‘bravery’ you speak of are a façade, an egotistical over-evaluation of your convictions and morality. because when it matters, you are all aligned with the oppressive powers you were supposed to question. your colonial roots overtook your respect for our profession, for your beloved ‘news values.’
you will never know what it is like to be heroes.
being a hero is having the people you are investigating kill your entire family like they did to Wael Dahdouh, praying salah over their dead bodies still in your press vest and helmet, and then coming back to work the next day with tears in your eyes and a promise to keep going. bravery is Motaz Azaiza, Plestia Alaqad, and Hind Khoudary, who have watched their entire lives catch fire, their schools and universities, the neighborhoods they grew up in all reduced to dust and still choosing to pick up a camera and relay to us the truth because you refuse to.
Abdallah Alwan
Abdallah Iyad Breis
Abdelhalim Awad
Abdul Rahman Saima
Abdulhadi Habib
Abdullah Darwish
Adel Zorob
Adham Hassouna
Ahmad Jamal al Madhoun
Ahmed Abu Mhadi
Ahmed Al-Qara
Ahmed Bdeir
Ahmed Khaireddine
Ahmed Shehab
Akram El Shafie Safa
Alaa Al-Hams
AlHassan Hamad
Amjad Juhjouh
Amro Salah Abu Hayah
Angam Ahmad Edwan
Assem Al-Barsh Al-Rai
Assem Kamal Moussa
Ayat Khadoura
Ayman Al-Gharbawi
Ayman Al-Rafati
Bahaaddine Yassine
Bilal Jadallah
Duaa Jabbour
Duaa Sharaf
Farah Omar
Ghassan Najjar
Hamada Al-Yaziji
Hamza Al Dahdouh
Hamza Murtaja
Haneen Baroud Al Majedat
Haneen Kashtan
Hassan Farajallah
Hassouneh Salim
Heba Al-Abadla
Hisham Alnwajha
Husam Mubarak
Hussam al-Dabbaka
Ibrahim Al-Gharbawi
Ibrahim Marzouq
Ibrahim Mohammad Lafi
Ibrahim Muhareb
Imad Al-Wahidi
Ismail Al Ghoul
Issam Abdallah
Issam Bhar
Iyad El-Ruwagh
Iyad Matar
Jabr Abu Hadrous
Jamal Al-Faqaawi
Jamal Mohamed Haniyeh
Khalil Abu Aathra
Mahmoud Juhjouh
Majd Fadl Arandas
Majed Kashko
Marwan Al Sawaf
Mohamad Al-Bayyari
Mohamad Al-Iff Al-Rai
Mohamed Abu Hassira
Mohamed Adel Abu Skheil
Mohamed Azzaytouniyah
Mohamed El Sayed Abu Skheil
Mohamed El-Reefi
Mohamed Jamal Sobhi Al-Thalathini
Mohamed Khalifeh
Mohamed Manhal Abu Armana
Mohamed Mouin Ayyash
Mohamed Nabil Al-Zaq
Mohamed Naser Abu Huwaidi
Mohamed Yaghi
Mohammad Balousha
Mohammad Jarghoun
Mohammed Abed Rabbo
Mohammed Abu Daqqa
Mohammed Abu Hatab
Mohammed Abu Jasser
Mohammed Al-Salhi
Mohammed Al-Tanani
Mohammed Ali
Mohammed Atallah
Mohammed Bassam Al Jamal
Mohammed Imad Labad
Mohammed Issa Abu Saada
Mohammed Reda
Mohammed Sobh
Mohmmed Abu Sharia
Montaser Al Sawaf
Mossab Ashour Freelance
Mostafa Al Sawaf
Mostafa Bakeer Al Aqsa TV
Moussa Al-Borsh
Muhammad Salama
Mustafa Ayyad
Mustafa Thuraya
Nadia Emad Al Sayed
Nafez Abdel Jawad
Nazmi Al-Nadim
Ola Al Dahdouh
Ola Atallah
Rabih Al Maamari
Rami Al Refee
Rasheed Albably
Rizq Abu Shakian
Rizq Al-Gharabli
Roee Idan
Roshdi Sarraj
Saadi Madoukh
Saed Al-Halabi
Saed Radwan
Saeed al-Taweel
Saher Akram Rayan
Salam Mema
Salem Abu Toyour
Sameeh Al-Nady
Samer Abu Daqqa
Sari Mansour
Shaima El-Gazzar
Shareef Okasha Freelance
Tamim Abu Muammar
Tarek El Sayed Abu Skheil
Tareq AlSalhi
Tariq Al-Maidna
Wafa Al-Udaini
Wafaa Abu Dabaan
Wissam Kassem Al-Manar TV
Yacoup Al-Borsh
Yahya Abu Manih
Yasser Abu Namous
Yasser Mamdouh El-Fady
Yazan al-Zuweidi
Yousef Maher Dawas
Zayd Abu Zayed
as the dana scott’s of the world spread israeli propganda, 137 martyrs were laid to rest because they chose death over professional spinelessness.
western journalists had better remember their names. their blood is on your hands too.
i wrote a version of this piece almost a year ago for 1202 magazine. at the time, 57 journalists had been killed. every single name i had to add made me feel nauseous. i’m aware that rent free has always had a culture first, politics as critique focus but sometime we need to be explicit in our condemnation of evil. i have not stopped thinking about Palestine since the israeli attack on Al Aqsa mosque in 2021. i’ve pitched this essay multiple times to multiple publications- 1202 was the only magazine that had the balls to take it on. this spinelessness is not only present among the politics lot, it’s everywhere. i refuse to be one of those writers who stays silent because it is convenient; in fact, i pray to be as much of an inconvenience to these systems as i can be.
i pray that you’ll join me in being inconvenient and loud. may those who have been killed be granted jannah. may we see a free Palestine in our lifetimes.
until next time loves,
aa x
thank you for writing this!! as someone who studied journalism i never agreed w 'neutrality' when it served the purpose of normalizing/ validating the oppressor. what weight do words carry if not used for moral good? if not read to alter the status quo? each palestinian journalist that is now a martyr at the hands of zionism is so heartbreaking
This means everything to me. Thank you for taking the time to remember them with me 🤍